Коншпирология на марше
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...&articleId=1071October 12, 2005
The Avian Flu Fright is Politically Timed
A Public Health Warning
and Political Essay
by Dr. Leonard Horowitz
October 12, 2005
GlobalResearch.ca
Abstract
The Avian Flu Fright: Politically Timed
for Global Iatrogenocide
If avian flu b
ecomes more than a threatened p
andemic, it will have done so by political
and economic design. This
thesis is supported by current massive media misrepresentations, profiteering on risky
and valueless vaccines, gross neglect of data evidencing earlier similar man-made plagues including SARS, West Nile Virus, AIDS
and more; continuance of genetic studies breeding more mutant flu viruses likely to outbreak, inside t
rading sc
andals involving p
andemic savvy White House
and drug industry
officials, curious immunity of
these pharmaceutical entities over
the past century to law en
forcement
and mainstream media scrutiny,
and published official de
population objectives. With
the revelations
and assertions advanced herein,
the public is
forewarned against this physician-assisted mass murder best termed iatrogenocide.* This genocidal imposition is expected to serve mainly
economic
and political
depopulation objectives.
Background
In April, 2003, a social experiment called SARS, said to have arrived from Asia, heavily struck Toronto. I was
there throughout most of this Asian flu-
foreshadowing fright. This bizarre new pneumonia-like illness was named Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome. It was said to be
the latest threat in an ongoing series of attacks on humanity by mysteriously mutating "supergerms."
A careful study of
the scientific
and medical-sociological correlates
and antecedents of this outbreak revealed something amiss far more insidious than SARS. I critically considered Torontos media reaction as any Harvard-trained public health expert in media persuasion behavioral science might.
The scourge had all
the earmarks of a novel social experiment conducted by white-collar bioterrorist.
It
seemed clear to me that this unprecedented
population manipulation effectively indoctrinated
the mass mind in support of a grossly ineffective, albeit legislated, public health response in advance of
the arrival of "
the Big One." Throughout
the SARS Scam,(1) repeated references were made to biological agents that might facilitate decimation of approximately a third to half of
the world's
population. Having extensively reviewed political
population control literature
and contemporary objectives of leading global indus
trialists, I noted
these predictions were in close keeping with current official
population r
eduction objectives.(2)
Canadas response to SARS in 2003 was,
for the first time in history, directed by
the United Nations
and World Health Organization (WHO). Having reviewed
the intimate financial
and administrative ties between
these organizations,
the Rockefeller family, Carnegie Foundation,
and the worlds leading drug makers,
the fox, in essence, reigned over Canadas chickens.
The truth
about plagues includes
the fact that no gr
and p
andemic ever evolved divorced from major socio-political upheaval." SARS advanced a political agenda more than a public health emergency. If public health officials earnestly intended to prevent
these new emerging diseases, or successfully treat
them at
their roots, I repeated,
they would study
their obvious origins from
the merged military-medical-biotechnology arena. A basic course in medical sociology simply justifies this utilitarian counsel.
"Experts" had been predicting
the arrival of a super-plague
for decades. What was HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS
about the mysterious
and terrifying arrival of SARS, however, was its timing. It synchronously arrived with
the global war on terrorism,
and the Anglo-American war with Iraq. It
seemed a convenient distraction from
the fact that
the earlier Bush administration had shipped Saddam Hussein most of his deadly biological weapons arsenal including anthrax
and West Nile Virus. SARS was pathognomonic (i.e., symptomatic
and characteristic) of what I had predicted
and explained in
the book, Death in
the Air: Globalism, Terrorism
and Toxic Warfare (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2001;
http://www.healthyworlddistributing.com/), a prophetically-titled text that predated
the 9-11 attacks on America by several months,
and provided a contextual analysis of certain globalists links to
recent outbreaks.
In essence, I provided insight into
the broad application of a new
form of institutionalized "bioterrorism" consistent with state sponsored biological warfare. Saddam Hussein was said to have exposed
populations in his
and adjacent l
ands with biological
and chemical weapons of mass destruction. SARS
and the current avian flu fright is sanctioned by military-medical-pharmaceutical-petrochemical indus
trialists likewise operating above
the law in many documented instances. Having testified be
fore
the U.S. Congress, I personally experienced how premiere pharmaceutical indus
trialists direct our political-
economic representatives in
government. Emerging diseases complement
the political "War on Terrorism,"
and our bioterror-influenced c
ulture. This agenda serves two primary objectives: profitability
and population-r
eduction.
Political Reality Versus Mass-Mediated Myths
The ever increasing madness around us is eerily consistent with globalist think tank r
ecommendations
for the current "conflicts short of war." Beginning in
the late 1960s, "
economic substitutes
for st
andard militarization" were sought
and found by leading global indus
trialists.
New biological threats,
the war on terrorism,
and increasing
numbers of natural disasters including space-based threats
and superstorms were considered
economically
and politically expedient compared with
the first
and s
econd world wars.
These conflicts short of war were decidedly more manageable
and economically viable.
For this reason, especially
their profitability,
they were leading options among Anglo-American policy makers.
Nelson Rockefellers protégé, Henry Kissinger,
for instance, as National Security Advisor (NSA) under Richard Nixon, oversaw
foreign policy while considering Third World
population r
eduction "necessities"
for the U.S., Britain, Germany,
and o
ther allies. This Bush nominee to direct
the 9-11 conspiracy investigation, a reputed war criminal,
then selected
the option to have
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) develop biological weapons, according to
the U.S. Congressional R
ecord of 1975. Among
these new man-made biological weapons were germs far deadlier than
the avian flu.
For example, by 1968, when Kissinger requested
and received updated intelligence on useful syn
thetic biological agents
for germ warfare
and population control, mutant r
ecombinant flu viruses had just been engineered by Special Virus
Cancer Program researchers OConner, Stewart, Kinard, Rauscher
and o
thers.(3) During this
program, influenza
and parainfluenza viruses were r
ecombined with quick acting
leukemia viruses (acute lymphocytic
leukemia) to deliver weapons that
potentially spread
cancer, like
the flu, by sneezing.
These researchers also amassed avian
cancer (sarcoma) viruses
and inoculated
them into humans
and monkeys to determine
their carcinogenicity. In related ef
forts, Raucher et al. used
radiation to enhance avian viruss
cancer-
causing potential.
These incredible scientific realities have been officially censored
and generally neglected by
the medias mainstream.
Similarly,
the Institute of Science in Society (IoSS) in London raised
the genetic engineering question in
the origin of SARS. Could genetic engineering have contributed inadvertently to creating
the SARS virus?
they asked. This point was not even considered by
the expert coronavirologists called in to help h
andle
the crisis, now being feted
and woed by pharmaceutical companies eager to develop vaccines. Those living in glass houses should not throw stones.
The above emphasis is added to show IoSS
they had not even considered intentional SARS deployment in
their scientific, allegedly unbiased, purview.(4)
Conflicts short of war, like
the "War on AIDS," "War on Drugs," "War on Terrorism," "War on
Cancer,"
and now War on
the Avian Flu require sophisticated propag
anda
programs employing fear campaigns
for social acceptance
and popular support of legislated policies.
These psychological operations (officially termed PSYOPS)
for comm
and and control warfare (technically called C2W), experts advise, best support
the emerging "Revolution in Military Affairs" (RMA).
The RMAs capabilities include "a
form of human slavery" in which
the worlds captive
populations would not know
they are enslaved.(2)
The RMA undoubtedly incorporates
the use of debilitating biologicals
and chemical agents most generously on behalf of drug
and vaccine makers. A classic example is
the toxic carcinogenic organophosphate pesticides deployed against human
populations, said to target mosquitoes, in
the "War Against
the West Nile Virus." Such "non-lethal warfare" agents, as
these are militarily termed, are indeed deadly, but mortality res
ults slowly from toxic exposures allowing more profits to be made by allied pharmaceutical
and medical indus
trialists. Victims of
the "non-lethal" exposures die slowly from chronic debilitating diseases. Expensive hospitals
and long-term care facilities are virtual concentration camps.
The ailments generated
for iatrogenocide include
the plethora of autoimmune diseases
and newer
cancers virtually non-existent 50 years ago. This fact, alone, strongly suggests a genocidal socio-
economic
and political agenda.
Avian Flu
for Profit
In response to SARS, senior fellow at
the Hudson Institute in Washington, Michael Fumento, published an
economic
thesis in Toronto related to
the one I advance here.
The "Super-bug or Super Scare," he wrote was published in Canadas National Post. Canadians were warned to "quarantine
themselves," wear masks,
and in some cases stay home.
The Ontario Health Minister declared a "health emergency," as
the media dubbed
the "mysterious killer" a "super-pneumonia. R
ecoiling from
the hype, Fumento asked
and answered a few real questions . . . How lethal, how transmissible,
and how treatable is this strain?
The answers, he concluded, leave no grounds
for excitement, much less panic.
The same may be said
for this new curse of avian flu.(1)
Lethal?
At this writing,
the avian flu is said to have killed
about 65 people in Sou
theast Asia during
the past two years! Little to no data is available on
these individuals who most commonly had immune-compromising medical conditions. Fur
ther, all deaths were in Asian countries with questionable health services.
Conversely, o
ther
forms of flu kill more than 40,000 North Americans annually, generally
the immune-compromised elderly.
Transmissibile?
According to USA Today (October 9, 2005),
European health officials are working to contain
the [avian flu] virus, which so far has not infected anyone in
the region. Although, allegedly more than 140 million
birds have died or been destroyed, . . .
and financial losses to
the po
ultry sector have topped $10 billion. This propag
anda actually admits,
the current virus, known as H5N1, has not yet mutated to
the point at which it can easily spread from person to person. In fact, it is likely to have never spread from person to person o
ther than during laboratory h
andling!(5)
Treatability?
The U.S. Senate has already approved a $3.9 billion package to buy vaccines
and antiviral medications,
and the Administration is also preparing a request
for an additional $6 billion to $10 billion, according to a current BusinessWeek report.( 6)
Beam me up Scottie,
there is no intelligent life on this planet. This
largely explains why
the public puts up with this deadly deception. Even USA Today bemoans,
there is no human vaccine yet. So how come
the U.S. Senate is rushing to spend all
these billions
for an avian flu vaccine?
I suppose we should overlook
the fact that
the current frightening strain of H5N1 avian flu virus has never readily jumped from human to human,
and not commonly from
birds to humans ei
ther. Thus, an effective vaccine can only be prepared by mutating this virus, thus creating what
the world fears most. Let me explain. . . .
To make
the human vaccine specific
for the H5N1 mutant virus, you must start with
the human virus which does not yet exist, except in perhaps military-biomedical-pharmaceutical laboratories. In fact, this is precisely what is being prepared based on news reports. To produce
the human pathogen,
the avian virus must be c
ultured
for lengthy periods of time in human cell c
ultures,
then injected into monkey
and ultimately humans to
see if
these experimental subjects get
the same feared flu. Thus,
the flu virus
the world currently fears most is ei
ther: 1) now being prepared in labs paid by indus
trialists with massive wealth-building incentives to accidentally release
the virus; or 2) has already been prepared in such labs to take advantage of this current fright
and future sales following
the viruss release.
Remember, to be effective against a virus, a vaccine is said to require specificity. If authorities were to now have
the main H5N1 avian flu strain feared to spread at some future date
theres no assurance by
the time
they developed
the vaccine
the strain would remain sufficiently
the same
for the vaccine to be effective anyway due to expected viral mutations. Viral mutations over time is a function of
the agents newness.
New man-made viruses, laboratory creations, like
the ones currently being prepared
for vaccine
trials, are less stable not having evolved over
the millennia. Thus,
the entire vaccine ef
fort is
largely, if not entirely, a sham with
ulterior motives.
Remember too, that a vaccines reliability requires years, or at least months, of testing in
the targeted
population. Vaccine injury data must, or should, be meticulously collected over this period to assure
the vaccine is not killing
and maiming more persons than it is helping or saving. Can you seriously believe this assurance will be provided by
government or pharmaceutical industry officials in this p
andemics wake? FEMAs failed Katrina response pails by comparison to this public health liability
and vaccine-injury certainty.
I say vaccine-injury certainty because of
the extensive list of newly developed vaccinations, highly touted when brought to market, that caused horrific res
ults. This list includes
the first swine flu vaccine, polio vaccines, smallpox vaccine, anthrax vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine,
and most
recently Lyme disease vaccine that crippled approximately 750,000 people within months of its release
and prior to its recall by
the FDA.
Most people fail to realize all vaccines carry a list of ingredients that typically increase human disease
and death (i.e., morbidity
and mortality).
These include toxic elements
and chemicals such as mercury, aluminum,
formaldehyde
and formalin (used to preserve corpses), MSG,
foreign genetic material,
and risky proteins from various species of bacteria, viruses,
and animals that have been scientifically associated with triggering autoimmune disorders
and certain
cancers. A growing
body of scientific evidence strongly suggests vaccines are
largely responsible
for increasing cases of autism
and o
ther learning disabilities, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, Lupus, MS, ALS, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, hay fever, allergies, chronic draining ear infections, type 1 autoimmune diabetes,
and many, many more p
andemics.
These chronic ailments are said to require long-term medical care
for the patients management
causing toxic side effects res
ulting in Americas leading killer--iatrogenic disease. That is, vaccines
and o
ther pharmaceutical industry inventions are literally killing or disabling millions with little ef
fort on
the part of
government officials
and their drug industry cohorts to arrest this scourge.
For all we know,
governments are ordering an avian flu vaccine that will precisely deliver this p
andemic to
the world to affect
population control. Absurd
thesis? Read on.
BusinessWeek expects avian flu vaccine stockpiling by
government officials will help
the Sanofi-Pasteur company on behalf of Sanofi-Aventis
and Chiron. Tamiflu, it reported is an antiviral manufactured by Roche, . . . considered effective against avian flu. . . .
The U.S. owns enough
for 4.3 million people, with more on order. BusinessWeek failed to report: 1) Tamiflus
safety and effectiveness has not been determined in people with o
ther chronic medical conditions--a significant percentage of
the U.S. population--
and common side effects of this drug include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bronchitis, stomach pain, dizziness, headaches,
and much, much more; 2) Roche (Hoffman-LaRoche) was found guilty of price fixing
the worlds supply of vitamins in 1999 as part of
the global petrochemical/pharmaceutical cartel evolved from Nazi-Germanys I.G. Farben organization;(2)(6)
and 3) Sanofi-Aventiss corporate colleagues include Merck, a company that
received a lions share of
the Nazi war chest at
the end of WWII, whose earnings plunged after
the withdrawal last year of its deadly Vioxx arthritis drug. According to
recent news reports, Merck is partnering with Sanofi-Aventis to produce
the worlds first sexually-transmitted-
cancer vaccine to be given to prepubescent boys
and girls.(7) Merck is infamous
for having developed
the first hepatitis B vaccines that triggered
the international AIDS p
andemic according to published scientific research
and stunning documents reprinted in this authors national bestselling book.(3)(8)
In
the weeks
and months following
the 9-11 attacks on America, I traced
the widely publicized anthrax mailings "mystery" to
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned biological weapons contractors with ties to Britain's MI6, Porton Down,
and this same Anglo-American pharmaceutical cartel.(9)
The anthrax mailings fanned fears of bioterrorism throughout America
and economically served primarily vaccine
and drug makers with administrative
and financial links to
these avian flu profiteers.(10)
People willingly relinquish
their civil rights
and personal freedoms in
the wake of such engineered frights.
The passage of
the infamous "Homel
and Security Act" in America,
and its counterpart in Canada, are classic examples of this societal direction,
forced legislation,
and egregious manipulation.
Why Asia?
How convenient that Asia is said to be
the origin, as with SARS, of this latest plague when Chinese-Anglo-American relations are strained to say
the least.
In
the days preceding
the emergence of
the first SARS cases, America raced to
the Pacific Rim to impact escalating aggressions on
the Korean peninsula. Communist China--a "most favored" t
rading partner with America--is politically allied with several American enemies, including those said to possess weapons of mass destruction, including Iraq. Coincidental? Not likely when viewing
the larger political picture involving
the Ango-American oligarchy's RMA, its global enterprises,
and instigated planet-wide "conflicts short of war."
Consider also
the fact
the media's mainstream has been heavily influenced, if not entirely controlled, by m
ulti-national corporate sponsors protecting
and advancing
the interests of a relatively small
number of global entities. Also recall that
the focus of news providers, on any given day or hour, res
ults from intelligence agency directives, according to reputable authorities including myriad retired news officials
and intelligence officers. So ask
and answer
the following intelligent questions:
* Why have American military
officials, beginning with Secretary of Defense William Cohen during
the Clinton years, publicized America's greatest vulnerability lies in
the realm of biological weapons wielded by terrorists? Is this not a
form of treason against
the United States to relay such sensitive intelligence to
potential enemies through
the mainstream press?
* Why does
the mainstream media continue to
foretell of
the expected arrival of
the "Big One"-an influenza virus that will produce a super-flu that will kill billions of people, like
the "Spanish flu" did between 1918-19, while totally disregarding
the individuals, organizations,
and laboratories that have labored to produce
these weapons of mass destruction? Even
the devastating Spanish Flu virus has been, literally, unear
thed
for fur
ther study
and, do you suppose, deployment?
* Why was
the "Spanish flu" influenza virus called
the "Spanish flu" when it originated, by historic accounts, in Tibet in 1917? It is said that Spanish newspapers were
the only ones reporting on
the great plague due to
their neutrality over World War I politics. However, Spain was as dear to America
then as Communist China is to
the United States today.
The "Spanish flu" was named such following two decades of disputes between America
and Spain over colonization of
the Caribbean Isl
ands, Hawaii
and the Philippines beginning with
the Spanish American war that ended in
the Philippines in 1902. In fact,
the gr
and Spanish flu began in military camps. Does this history appear to be repeating?
*Doesn't it make sense that America is being manipulated, if not targeted,
for the purpose of advancing globalistic agendas, central among
them is
population r
eduction?
The "Big One"
As mentioned above, during
the 1960s
and early 1970s, military biological weapons contractors with intimate ties to leading drug indus
trialists prepared mutants of influenza
and para-influenza viruses r
ecombined with acute lymphocytic
leukemia viruses. In o
ther words,
they stockpiled a quick spreading
cancer virus which may also be deployed.(3)
Alternatively, many infectious disease experts
and government health officials oblivious to this scientific reality say this avian flu might be
the 'Big One." Several days ago,
the United Nations released a report that stated as many as 150 million people worldwide might die from this avian flu.
Emma Ross of
the Associated Press reported on SARS as
the World Health Organization (WHO) launched its "crisis plan to attack"
the Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome. WHO, as you may recall, is a U.N. sponsored organization that is rumored to have helped spread AIDS to Africa by way of contaminated hepatitis B
and/or polio vaccinations.
There is a reasonable amount of evidence to support this contention.(1)
More disconcerting,
the U.N. is known to be heavily influenced by Rockefeller family members
and their petrochemical-pharmaceutical interests. History shows Rockefeller
fortunes built
the U.N. building in
New York City. During WWII,
the Rockefeller family
and their St
andard Oil Company supported Hitler more than
they did
the allies according to court r
ecords. One federal judge ruled Rockefeller committed "treason" against
the United States. Following WWII, according to attorney John Loftus-an official Nazi war crimes investigator-Nelson Rockefeller persuaded
the U.N.'s South American voting block to favor Israel's creation only to assure secrecy regarding his support
for the Nazis. Earlier that century, John D. Rockefeller joined Prescott Bush
and the British Royal Family in sponsoring
the eugenics initiatives that gave rise to Hitler's racial hygiene
programs. During
the same period
the Rockefeller family virtually monopolized American medicine, American pharmaceutics,
and the cancer and genetics industries.(2, 3)
Today, the Rockefeller family, its foundation, U.N. and WHO remain at the forefront of administering "population programs" designed to reduce world populations to more manageable levels. As per an advertisement in Foreign Affairs--a prestigious political periodical published by the David Rockefeller directed Council on Foreign Relations--the U.S. population is being targeted for a 50% reduction.(2)
"We've never faced anything on this scale with such a global reach, said Dr. David Heymann, of
the WHO, not regarding
the avian flu, but SARS.
"This is
the first time that a global network of [Rockefeller-directed infectious disease surveillance outposts
and] laboratories are sharing in
formation, samples, blood, pictures," added Dr. Klaus Stohr, a WHO virologist coordinating labs
internationally. "Basically
overnight,
there are no secrets,
there is no jealousy,
there is no competition in
the face of a global health emergency. This is a phenomenal network.(1)\
*
The term iatrogenocide is derived from
the combination of words iatrogenesis, meaning physician induced illness,
and genocide, defined as
the mass killing
and/or enslaving of people
for economics, politics,
and/or ideology.
About the Author Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., is an
internationally known authority in
the overlapping fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases,
and bioterrorism. Dr. Horowitz is best known
for his national bestselling book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola - Nature, Accident or Intentional? (Tetrahedron Press, 1998; 1-888-508-4787) which
recently res
ulted in
the United States General Accounting Office investigating
the man-made origin of AIDS
theory. (
See:
http://www.healingcelebrations.com/gao.htm ) Dr. Horowitz's work in
the field of vaccination risk awareness has prompted at least three Third World nations to change
their vaccination policies. His stunning testimony be
fore
the United States Congress'
Government Re
form Committee, literally brought
the hearing to a halt. (
See: healingcelebrations.com) Dr. Horowitz questioned
government health officials regarding a Centers
for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) secreted report showing a definitive link between
the mercury ingredient (i.e., Thimerosal), common to most vaccinations,
and the skyrocketing rates of autism
and behavioral disorders affecting our children
and the future of our nation.
Dr. Horowitz's most
recent book is DNA: "Pirates of
the Sacred Spiral", a reference text on
the electro-genetics of biology, disease
therapy,
and human spirituality. This work also details links between
the anthrax mailings
and human genome project heist,
and leading intelligence agency, genetics industry,
and pharmaceutical company officials.
For more in
formation
about Dr. Horowitzs books, videos, CDs
and DVDs link to
www.healthyworlddistributing.com
and www.tetrahedron.org, or by calling 1-888-508-4787. His official
web is
www.drlenhorowitz.com.
This article was provided courtesy of Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
and Tetrahedron Publishing Group. Its copyright is relinquished
for widespread distribution.
References:
1) Horowitz LG. SARS (Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome): A Great Global Scam. Available at:
http://www.healingcelebrations.com/SARS.htm 2) Horowitz LG. Death in
the Air: Globalism, Terrorism
and Toxic Warfare. S
andpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, (Spring) 2001.
3) Horowitz LG. Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola, Nature, Accident or Intentional? S
andpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, (Spring) 2001.
4)
The Institute of Science in Society. SARS
and Genetic Engineering? London, Engl
and. Article available at:
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health...ngineering.html 5) Knox N.
Europe braces
for avian flu. USA TODAY, October 9, 2005; Manning A.
Government to stock up on avian flu shots. USA Today, Oct 8, 2005.
6) Wang P. Avian Flu: Inoculate Your Portfolio. BusinessWeek.
Online edition. Available at:
http://www.businessweek.com/investor/conte..._4988_pi015.htm 7) CNNMoney. Merck shares jump on
cancer drug vaccine. October 6, 2005. Available at:
http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortu...500/merck.reut/ 8)
For more scientific background on
the link between
the hepatitis B vaccine
and the AIDS p
andemic link to
http://www.originofAIDS.com .
9) Horowitz LG.
The CIA's Role in
the Anthrax Mailings: Could Our Spies be Agents
for Military-Indus
trial Sabotage, Terrorism,
and Even
Population Control? A Special Report. Article available at:
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/anthra..._espionage.html 10) Horowitz LG. DNA: Pirates of
the Sacred Spiral. S
andpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2004.
Рекламный блок.
Загрузка. Пожалуйста, подождите...
Ваша реклама, здесь
